Where can you post essays for discussion

What to look for when writing an essay

1. Introduction: Name the topic, present the "hook", disclose the procedure:

Why is the topic, why are the explanations relevant to it? What is the 'problem' to be solved below? It is important to emphasize the relevance of the topic here and to make it palatable to the reader. These are z. B. well-known or concise quotations, or provocative theses, but also brief introductions to the content that describe the problem as such, may be appropriate (examples: “Although it has been over for a century, it is a controversial question to this day who is to blame for the problem First World War bears ”-“ What you hang your heart on is your God ”- it seems as if Luther already suspected the power that consumption will receive later”).

The first sentence of an essay should be short and concise about what you think about the topic and generate a reaction from the reader.
Dipl.-Psychologist Miriam Spering (2002, p. 5)

Then make it transparent how you are approaching the problem: What content will follow, how will the essay be structured? Are you arguing in the style of a linear essay or a deliberative discussion? What is the material or fact base? It can and should be mentioned here that there is no overall presentation, but a narrowly limited argumentation.

It makes sense to only write the introduction at the end of the thesis, as the relevance often only becomes clear when dealing with the topic. Here you can then see how you proceeded.

2. Bulk:

Limit yourself to selected aspects - an essay is never exhaustive, but approaches a problem from a narrowly defined perspective. Make sure that the facts and arguments actually relate to the question - quality comes before quantity. Why you present which content must be implicitly or explicitly clear when content is weighted and evaluated with a view to the question - only then do arguments arise from the content! Simply naming and retelling the content is not enough. Examples: Is it really important how old the European rulers were for the question of guilt in the First World War? Is there a need to indicate GDP for the subject of modern consumption? Copying from Wikipedia or copying from specialist books is really not an achievement in itself.

It is also important to ensure that the individual contents or arguments are clearly related to one another. A mere list is not enough. If there is no adequate transition between the individual aspects, you should check their relevance for the topic again in detail - in this case less can also be more. Pay particular attention to the beginning of a sentence: If “continue” or something similar is found here too often, this indicates that the explanations are listed, which must be avoided at all costs.


3. Enough:

Name the result of the comments: What are the conclusions from what has been written above? Firstly, pay attention to the open brackets in the introduction and secondly refer to the content presented, but do not offer any repetition! A transparent and well-founded judgment is required - possibly also an explicit statement of your own and / or a personal word. If necessary, disclose values ​​against which you will judge.

In the end, both the introduction with the question and the main part with the corresponding content must be recognizable. It should be written in such a way that a reader can also skip the main part and find the answer to the question asked at the beginning plausibly; at the same time, reference must be made to the content of the main part without repeating it. It is often a good idea to point out any unanswered questions and / or further or other related problems or questions that came to your mind after you wrote the essay.


4. Shape:

The individual parts are not identified as such by their own headings or sections. Only paragraphs mark the transitions - so make sure that the three parts of the essay both clearly distinguish themselves from one another in terms of content and (nevertheless) merge smoothly into one another.