Think BBC news is impartial
"Assault on the truth" poses a threat
The New York Times newsroom was in an uproar. She had published an article that was classified as offensive - to her own journalists. Less than two weeks after George Floyd's death, Republican Senator Tom Cotton had written an opinion section article entitled “Time to Send in the Troops”.
As a result, employees of the newspaper wrote a letter to management. "The decision to present this point of view without additional context makes the American public [...] vulnerable," they said.
The column's editor was sacked.
Yesterday the BBC's Director General made a statement affirming the importance of "trustworthy, impartial" news. As the dispute in the New York Times shows, some journalists are questioning this.
According to media expert Andrey Mir, we have entered the age of “post journalism”. Journalists suppress the views of people with whom they disagree and report the news with bias.
Supporters see this as an answer to Donald Trump's deliberate lies. When people hold dangerous views it is their duty to prevent readers from sharing them.
"Just reporting the bare facts [and] not being on everyone's side [...] doesn't always work, especially in these times," said Margaret Sullivan of the Washington Post.
This contradicts the Code of Ethics of the American Society of Professional Journalists "seek the truth and report it".
Can journalism ever represent the objective truth?
Newspaper and opinion
No. Everyone is biased. Even journalists who try to be impartial can never be entirely successful. Your research will depend on the resources, how much time they have and who they are working with.
Yes. Many shocking facts would not have come to light without journalists. The Dreyfus case and the My Lai massacre are examples of truth-clarification reporting. Journalism underpins democracy.
- Would you protest if someone at your school gives a speech that goes against your own views?
- In pairs, writes two newspaper articles, one containing a factual account of an imaginary event and the other a biased one.
Some people say
"Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference and an elegant one for ignorance."G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936) British author
What do you mean?
F & R
- What we know
- The internet and the polarization of political views have made it very difficult for news organizations to take an impartial stance. In the past, they saw objectivity as the key to attracting as many readers as possible. Now more than ever, people are consuming media that reflect their own views. It is therefore in the commercial interests of news agencies to get these views to the point.
- What we don't know
- The question is whether journalists have the right to tell other people what to think. A senior journalist complains that his colleagues see themselves as a “priestly caste” with a better understanding of truth and justice than others. Another argues that because most US journalists are middle-class, white and live in either New York, Washington DC, or Los Angeles, they have little sympathy for the rest of America.
- point of view
- opinion section
- General Director
- More trustworthy
- More impartial
- Code of Ethics
- code of ethics
- media coverage
- What helps in stock trading
- Where does the English dialect come from?
- What are the roaring twenties
- Is Kashmir Switzerland from India
- Where do farmers sell their products
- Can i tweet someone
- What are the issues with assertiveness
- How can I download technical books for free
- How can we say respond in Telugu
- Why is modern society so boring
- What is irresponsible adolescent behavior
- What is your strangest possession
- Where is the Siachen Glacier
- How fast does an eye blink
- Open ministry is legal
- When did the Zhou dynasty end?
- What does Bre mean in Romanian
- How did you develop your accent
- Teens should have sexual intercourse
- Which social networking SEO is the best
- Why are the Florida people so strange
- Can the BJP now win elections in Delhi?
- How harmful is the use of caffeine during pregnancy
- How do I deal with a manipulative spouse